E-rate / Providers / Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.

Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.: E-rate funding and districts served

Chickasaw Telecom, Inc. holds $4.3M in E-rate funding commitments across 1 state in FY2024-2026, serving 13 applicants in FY2026. Here is where, for what, and which of those contracts end soon.

Oklahoma · updated nightly from USAC open data
For providers and resellersWhat Chickasaw Telecom, Inc. means for you
3applicants

Contracts ending within 12 months

Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.'s E-rate contracts that reach their end date in the next year, by applicant.

$377K of current service
13applicants

Incumbent today

Applicants Chickasaw Telecom, Inc. served in FY2026. Each one is a district to defend, or to take.

15% of its FY2026 requests had a single bidder
6applicants

Lost to a rival this year

Applicants that bought the same service from another provider in FY2026.

Most to United Systems, LLC
See its districts and contracts →Free account. Opens on Chickasaw Telecom, Inc. with every applicant, the contract end dates and the open 470s in those states.
Competing with Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.? See every district it serves, when each contract ends, and who else bid.Winning at its districts: United Systems, LLC (2), GigaPop Internet Services LLC (1), NetFabric (1), OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents) (1)Is this your company? Claim your book, free
$1.2M
committed FY2026
13
applicants served
1
state
3
contracts ending, 12 months

Commitments by year

Funding yearCommitted
FY2026$1,169,275
FY2025$1,329,604
FY2024$1,825,721

By state and service

Oklahoma $4.3MInternal connections $4.3MMaintenance $69K

Largest applicants served

ApplicantStateServicesCommitted
Elk City Indep School Dist 6OKInternal connections$230,752
Midwest City-Del City Sch DistOKInternal connections$194,769
Bartlesville School DistrictOKInternal connections$185,051
Santa Fe South Schools, Inc.OKInternal connections$118,671
Collinsville SchoolsOKInternal connections$114,446
Tulsa City-County Library SysOKInternal connections$90,894
Weatherford School District 26OKInternal connections$70,253
Sulphur Indep School Dist 1OKInternal connections$63,167
Noble Indep School District 40OKInternal connections$26,818
Norwood School District 14OKInternal connections$25,649
Anadarko School District I 20OKInternal connections$23,573
Durant Indep School Dist 72OKMaintenance$14,800
Red River Technology CenterOKInternal connections$10,432

Contracts ending in the next 12 months

ApplicantStateServiceCommittedEnds
Oklahoma City-Metropolitan Library SystemOKInternal connections$56,199Sep 30, 2027
Midwest City-Del City Sch DistOKInternal connections$206,320Sep 30, 2027
Collinsville SchoolsOKInternal connections$114,446Sep 30, 2027

Who is winning at its districts

Providers that sold the same service in FY2026 to an applicant Chickasaw Telecom, Inc. served in FY2025.

ProviderApplicants won in FY2026
United Systems, LLC2
GigaPop Internet Services LLC1
NetFabric1
OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents)1
Pinnacle Business Systems, Inc.1
See which districts each provider serves, and when the contracts end.
Works for any provider, including your competitors, with the Form 470s open in your territory.
See competitors' districts, free →

Win the next E-rate cycle

Lakewave's E-rate Sweep shows every open Form 470 in your territory, the incumbent at each district, its Category 2 budget left and what it runs today.

Create a free account

Catch every Form 470

See the 470s open in your territory, what each district runs today, and whether it names a brand.

Displace incumbents

See which provider serves each district, what it bought, and when the contract ends.

Find C2 money left

See how much Category 2 budget each district has left in the FY2026-2030 cycle.

Price to win

See the unit prices districts actually paid, by model, from E-rate line items.

Free account · No credit card · Built from public records, refreshed nightly

Compiled from public records and refreshed nightly; last updated Oct 18, 2026. Figures are as USAC publishes them; committed amounts are funding commitments, not payments. Contract end dates on June 30 are left out because many applicants enter the funding-year end instead. Check the source before acting. See something wrong? Tell us and we will correct it.