· rebuilt nightly from public records
As of Nov 11, 2026, the median unit price applicants entered for the Cisco Meraki MS130-48X-HW on E-rate requests in FY2024-2026 was $3,494, from 197 line items at 144 schools and libraries; half were between $3,101 and $3,791.
Built from 197 Form 471 line items for the Cisco Meraki MS130-48X-HW (Data Distribution) in FY2024-2026: the price by funding year, by order size and by state, and the service providers that quoted it.
The middle of 197 unit prices entered on E-rate requests, FY2024-2026.
Half paid $3,101 to $3,791A quarter of these line items came in at or under this price.
Lowest tenth: $2,733 or lessMedian on lines of 10 to 49 units, against lines of 1 to 9 units.
$3,156 vs $3,527| Funding year | Line items | Median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 51 | $3,564 | $3,151 to $4,200 |
| FY2025 | 80 | $3,431 | $3,132 to $3,544 |
| FY2024 | 66 | $3,476 | $3,081 to $3,791 |
Bigger orders usually price lower; a line's quantity is the number of units the applicant requested on it.
| Units on the line | Line items | Median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 9 units | 153 | $3,527 | $3,228 to $3,791 |
| 10 to 49 units | 39 | $3,156 | $2,852 to $3,527 |
States with at least 5 priced line items for this model.
| State | Line items | Median | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | 31 | $3,791 | $3,527 to $3,791 |
| Pennsylvania | 21 | $3,292 | $2,967 to $3,476 |
| New York | 20 | $3,630 | $3,559 to $5,305 |
| Texas | 14 | $3,471 | $2,662 to $3,683 |
| California | 9 | $3,544 | $3,544 to $3,905 |
| New Jersey | 9 | $3,296 | $3,228 to $3,551 |
| Alabama | 8 | $3,073 | $2,748 to $3,448 |
| Iowa | 6 | $3,083 | $2,800 to $3,233 |
| Tennessee | 6 | $4,608 | $4,302 to $4,954 |
| Georgia | 5 | $3,331 | $3,296 to $3,548 |
| Idaho | 5 | $3,214 | $3,049 to $3,399 |
| Illinois | 5 | $3,530 | $3,309 to $3,708 |
| Minnesota | 5 | $3,515 | $3,049 to $4,200 |
| Washington | 5 | $3,100 | $3,075 to $3,296 |
Providers named on the funding requests these line items belong to.
| Provider | Line items | Applicants |
|---|---|---|
| Encore Technology Group LLC | 30 | 2 |
| Networking Technologies, LLC | 17 | 7 |
| TechnologyLab, LLC | 15 | 14 |
| CDW Government LLC | 10 | 10 |
| iWise Consulting, Inc. | 8 | 5 |
| Riverside Technologies, Inc. | 7 | 6 |
| Ednetics, Inc. | 6 | 6 |
| Blue Plains Technology, LLC | 5 | 4 |
| ComSource, Inc. | 5 | 2 |
| MSI Net Inc. | 5 | 5 |
| AMS.NET, Inc. | 4 | 3 |
| Advanced Networks of Texas | 4 | 4 |
| DISYS Solutions, Inc. | 4 | 3 |
| Questivity Inc. | 4 | 4 |
| ACS International Resouces, Inc. | 3 | 3 |
The most requested data distribution models from other manufacturers, with their median unit price.
The median unit price on FY2024-2026 E-rate requests was $3,494, from 197 line items at 144 schools and libraries; half were between $3,101 and $3,791.
Before. They are the unit prices applicants entered on their Form 471 line items. USAC then pays its share at the applicant's discount rate, which is 20 to 85 percent for Category 2 equipment.
Order size, what is bundled on the line (licenses, support, accessories), the state and the provider all move the price. On these requests, lines of 10 to 49 units had a median of $3,156, against $3,527 for lines of 1 to 9 units.
By line items in FY2024-2026: South Carolina (31); Pennsylvania (21); New York (20).
Lakewave's E-rate Sweep shows every open Form 470 in your territory, the incumbent at each district, its Category 2 budget left and what it runs today.
Create a free accountSee the 470s open in your territory, what each district runs today, and whether it names a brand.
See which provider serves each district, what it bought, and when the contract ends.
See how much Category 2 budget each district has left in the FY2026-2030 cycle.
See the unit prices districts actually paid, by model, from E-rate line items.
Free account · No credit card · Built from public records, refreshed nightly
Compiled from public records and refreshed nightly; last updated Nov 11, 2026. Figures are as USAC publishes them; committed amounts are funding commitments, not payments. Contract end dates on June 30 are left out because many applicants enter the funding-year end instead. Check the source before acting. See something wrong? Tell us and we will correct it.